Ok i Just took this free test but i was unsure as to why i got several questions wrong. can anyone have a look and explain to me why.
Proctor & Gamble has argued that Pringles were not a potato crisp on account of the limited potato content and that they did not resemble crisps in that they were always a uniform shape and colour which you would not expect to find in potato crisps. A judge agreed that the product did not conform to the stipulations of the 1994 Act in that they were only 42% potato and that their special shape, the way they were packaged and the fact that they are made from a dough meant that they were more cake than crisp.
The result of the judgement from Mr Justice Warren means that Pringles will no longer be subject to VAT at 17.5%. This could mean that the price that consumers pay for the snack could now fall and for Proctor & Gamble the decision means that it will benefit to the tune of millions of pounds.
Question: This judgement means that the price consumers pay for Pringles will now fall.
The correct answer was cannot tell. However i chose false, my reasoning was that no the judgement does not mean directly mean that the price for pringles will fall but it is instead that in Proctor & Gambles hands as to wether they pass on these cuts.