?? Double standards?? I am not advocating a candidate be less than upfront, I am just telling him/her what would potentially happen. Now that they have all of this information it is up to them to make a decision to see if it is morally right or not.
Anyway, you can’t compare this to what I mentioned in the other thread. The friend of mine that had their offer withdrawn didn’t apply to PwC deceptively and would have gained nothing from omitting a 2.1 module result. How is that similar to what’s been posted in this thread?
Besides, as long as this candidate plans on starting with the Big Four firm in 2011, why would the Big Four care if they bummed around/interned/travelled in the period leading up to that?